ATI RN
Infection Control Answers and Questions Questions
Question 1 of 5
Several measures to reduce urinary tract infections have been implemented at a long-term care facility. The most important action that will reduce infections is:
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The correct answer is option B) Maintaining a sterile, closed drainage system. This is the most important action to reduce urinary tract infections in a long-term care facility because keeping the drainage system closed and sterile helps prevent the entry of bacteria into the urinary tract, which is a common cause of infections. Option A) is not the most important action as meatal care alone may not be sufficient to prevent infections, especially if the drainage system is not maintained properly. Option C) of changing catheters every 7 days can actually increase the risk of infections as it introduces more opportunities for bacteria to enter the urinary tract during catheter changes. Option D) of continuous antibiotic bladder irrigation is not recommended for all patients as it can lead to antibiotic resistance and other complications. In an educational context, it is crucial to emphasize the importance of maintaining a sterile, closed drainage system in preventing urinary tract infections. Educating healthcare providers and staff on proper catheter care, infection control measures, and the risks associated with unnecessary interventions can help reduce the incidence of infections and improve patient outcomes in long-term care settings.
Question 2 of 5
The IP wants to ensure that the educational programs are based on the most rigorous and reliable sources of clinical evidence. Which of the following sources would best meet this need?
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is option A) Standards issued by national or international authoritative sources. This choice is the best option to ensure that educational programs are based on the most rigorous and reliable sources of clinical evidence for several reasons. Firstly, standards issued by national or international authoritative sources are developed through a thorough process that involves input from a wide range of experts in the field. These standards are based on the most current research, evidence-based practices, and consensus agreements among professionals. By following these standards, the IP can be confident that the educational programs are aligned with the most up-to-date and reliable information available. On the other hand, option B) Best-practice guidelines from professional organizations may vary in quality and rigor depending on the organization issuing them. While many professional organizations do provide evidence-based guidelines, there can be variability in the strength of evidence used to develop these guidelines. Option C) Consensus statements published by leading subject matter experts may also provide valuable insights, but they may not always be as comprehensive or as rigorously vetted as standards from authoritative sources. Consensus statements are based on the opinions of experts rather than a systematic review of all available evidence. Option D) Literature review of publications during the past 5 years is a valuable method for staying current with the latest research findings. However, not all publications are of equal quality, and it can be challenging to sift through the vast amount of literature available to identify the most reliable sources of evidence. In an educational context, it is crucial for infection preventionists (IPs) to have access to the most reliable and evidence-based information when developing educational programs. By relying on standards issued by national or international authoritative sources, IPs can ensure that their programs are grounded in the best available clinical evidence, ultimately leading to improved practices and outcomes in infection control.
Question 3 of 5
A measles exposure from a patient in a clinic was identified and an exposure work-up was initiated. A staff exposure was defined as 'nonimmune HCP with more than 5 minutes of same-room contact or face-to-face with the index patient.' Forty-eight HCP were identified as possible exposures. Of these, 44 had documented immunity to measles. Of the remaining HCP, three did not have the same room or face-to-face contact. How many HCP were at risk of developing measles because of the exposure?
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: In this scenario, the correct answer is C) 1. The rationale behind this is that out of the 48 healthcare personnel (HCP) identified as possible exposures, 44 already had documented immunity to measles, and three did not have the required contact with the index patient. Therefore, only one HCP, who did not have immunity and had the necessary contact, is at risk of developing measles due to the exposure. Option A) 4 is incorrect because the question clearly states that 44 HCP had documented immunity, and three did not have the required contact, leaving only one at risk. Option B) 45 is incorrect because it includes all the HCP identified as possible exposures, whereas the question specifies that only those without immunity and with the required contact are at risk. Option D) 48 is incorrect as it includes all the HCP identified as possible exposures, but the question focuses on those who are truly at risk based on the defined criteria. This question is essential in an infection control context as it highlights the importance of understanding immunity status and the level of contact needed for disease transmission. It reinforces the need for clear definitions and criteria when assessing risks of exposure in healthcare settings, emphasizing the significance of proper infection control practices to protect both patients and healthcare workers.
Question 4 of 5
An outbreak of encephalitis occurred in Malaysia and Singapore in 1998 - 1999. What was the causative agent?
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D) Nipah virus. In the outbreak of encephalitis in Malaysia and Singapore in 1998-1999, the causative agent was identified as the Nipah virus. This virus is zoonotic, meaning it can be transmitted from animals to humans, often through the consumption of contaminated fruits or exposure to infected animals like pigs. The Nipah virus primarily affects the respiratory and central nervous systems, leading to symptoms such as fever, headache, dizziness, and potentially fatal encephalitis. Option A) Ebola virus is incorrect because Ebola typically presents with severe hemorrhagic fever, not encephalitis. Option B) SARS virus caused Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, not encephalitis. Option C) Chikungunya virus causes a febrile illness with severe joint pain, not encephalitis. Educationally, understanding specific pathogens causing outbreaks is crucial for healthcare professionals to implement appropriate infection control measures, treatment protocols, and public health interventions. This case highlights the importance of zoonotic diseases and the One Health approach, emphasizing the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health in disease prevention and control.
Question 5 of 5
An elderly Singapore couple is thinking of returning to India to visit distant relatives whom they have not seen for 30 years. The need for cholera immunisation is brought up for discussion. Dukoral which is a cholera vaccine, is available in Singapore.
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D) Cholera is caused by gram positive cocci, Vibrio cholera. This answer is correct because cholera is actually caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which is a gram-negative bacterium, not gram positive cocci. Understanding the specific causative agent of cholera is crucial for proper diagnosis, treatment, and prevention strategies to be implemented. Option A) Cholera remains a 'required' immunization for international travel is incorrect because cholera vaccination is usually recommended for specific high-risk populations or travelers going to areas with known cholera outbreaks, but it is not a universally required immunization for all international travel. Option B) Dukoral is given as a single injection 1 week before travel is incorrect because Dukoral, the cholera vaccine, is actually administered orally in two doses, ideally taken at least 1 week before potential exposure to cholera-causing bacteria. Option C) The protective efficacy offered by Dukoral is at least 85% is incorrect because the protective efficacy of Dukoral, while high, is not specifically set at 85%. The exact efficacy can vary based on factors like age, immune status, and other variables. In an educational context, it is important for learners to understand the specific characteristics of infectious diseases, including their causative agents, modes of transmission, and prevention strategies. This knowledge is essential for healthcare professionals to provide accurate information to patients and make informed decisions regarding travel vaccinations and public health interventions.