Consumers are concerned with security issues related to their confidential health information being placed in an electronic health record (EHR). However, when the security of the EHR is compared with that of paper-and-pencil records, the EHR is:

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: more secure. Electronic Health Records (EHR) typically have built-in security features such as encryption, access controls, and audit trails, making it more secure than paper-and-pencil records. EHRs offer better protection against unauthorized access, tampering, and loss compared to traditional paper records. This is due to the ability to restrict access to specific users, track changes made to the records, and implement authentication measures. Therefore, the security of EHRs surpasses that of paper-and-pencil records. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because they do not acknowledge the enhanced security measures and advantages that EHRs provide over traditional paper records.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: root cause analysis. Root cause analysis involves identifying the underlying causes of an incident to prevent its recurrence. In this scenario, the nurse and manager are examining factors contributing to the infant falling off the scale. They are looking beyond the immediate event to understand the systemic issues that led to the incident, such as the need for additional staff during multiple births and the placement of the scale far from the delivery field. By conducting a root cause analysis, they aim to address these underlying issues and prevent similar incidents in the future. A: Standardization of care refers to consistent application of best practices, which is not the focus of the nurse and manager's actions in this situation. C: Process variation involves analyzing inconsistencies in processes, which is not the primary concern in this incident. D: Analysis of a deployment flowchart examines the flow of resources in a process, which is not directly related to identifying the root causes of the incident.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C: utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical principle that actions should be chosen based on their ability to maximize overall happiness or well-being. In this scenario, implementing hypertension screening and treatment for a community where most residents are hypertensive aligns with utilitarianism as it aims to benefit the greatest number of people by improving their health outcomes. This decision focuses on the overall good of the community, making it the most ethical choice. Rationale for why other choices are incorrect: A: Veracity is the principle of truthfulness. While honesty is important in healthcare decision-making, it is not the primary factor in this scenario. B: Values refer to personal beliefs and principles. While values may influence decision-making, the primary focus in this scenario is on maximizing community health outcomes. D: Autonomy is the principle of respecting individuals' right to make their own decisions. While autonomy is important in healthcare, it is not the guiding principle in this scenario where the focus is

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because it exemplifies the role of mentoring where the experienced nurse provides feedback and guidance to the novice nurse. Mentoring involves a structured and purposeful relationship aimed at professional growth. In this situation, the experienced nurse is directly interacting with the novice nurse, giving specific feedback on a task and showing support and encouragement. This helps the novice nurse improve their skills and knowledge. Option A is incorrect because it describes role modeling, where the novice nurse is observing without direct interaction. Option B is incorrect as it also describes role modeling through observation and mimicry. Option D is incorrect as it does not involve direct feedback or guidance from the experienced nurse to the novice nurse.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: Contact the elected representative's office by telephone to request support for the bill. This action is the most direct and effective way to influence the passage of the bill. By directly contacting the elected representative, the nurse can advocate for the importance of the bill and provide relevant information to garner their support. This direct communication with the decision-maker holds significant weight in influencing their vote on the bill. A: Explaining the rationale to the school board may be informative, but the school board may not have direct influence on the state legislature. C: Supporting a health advocate to run for election is a long-term strategy and may not have an immediate impact on the passage of the bill. D: Telling all students about the bill may raise awareness but may not directly influence the lawmakers' decisions.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C: Meta-analysis. In this scenario, the nurse researcher is combining and analyzing data from multiple studies on life satisfaction among hemodialysis patients to draw overall conclusions. Meta-analysis allows for generalization through synthesizing results from various studies, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the topic. Incorrect choices: A: Quasi-experimental - This involves manipulating variables to observe their effects, which is not the case in the given scenario. B: Secondary analysis - This refers to re-analyzing existing data, not multiple studies as in meta-analysis. D: Survey - Surveys involve collecting data directly from participants, whereas in this case, existing studies are being analyzed.

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D because the client's decision to destroy the husband's sperm was based on reflection and the value systems of both the wife and the husband. Firstly, the client considered her late husband's faith and beliefs, showing reflection on his values. Secondly, she analyzed the situation from various perspectives and considered alternatives, indicating a rational decision-making process. This decision was reached after careful consideration of ethical and moral implications, demonstrating a logical and reasoned approach. In contrast, choices A and C imply shortcomings in the client's decision-making process, while choice B focuses solely on validation without considering the underlying reasoning. Therefore, choice D is the most appropriate as it aligns with the client's thoughtful and value-based decision-making process.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: address the letter to "To Whom It May Concern." This is the appropriate procedure when the applicant is unsure of the recipient's name and title. It is a professional and formal way to address a cover letter when the specific recipient is unknown. Option B is incorrect as addressing the letter to a generic title like "Nurse Recruiter" may not be appropriate if the recipient does not hold that specific title. Option C may be time-consuming and unnecessary if the applicant can use a more general salutation. Option D is incorrect because leaving the salutation blank can come across as unprofessional and lazy.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: In developing a patient classification system, planned procedures are crucial as they determine resource allocation, staffing needs, and patient acuity. Understanding the procedures aids in categorizing patients accurately based on care requirements. Ethnic diversity, clinical competency, and educational level are not primary factors in this initial step as they do not directly impact patient classification. Ethnicity does not determine care needs, staff competency should already be ensured, and nurse education level is not the sole determinant of patient classification. Hence, A is the correct choice for developing an effective patient classification system.