About 500 children have just been exposed to radiation from a nuclear power plant accident. The most appropriate first step in your treatment of these children should be to

Questions 125

ATI RN

ATI RN Test Bank

Pediatric Research Questions Questions

Question 1 of 5

About 500 children have just been exposed to radiation from a nuclear power plant accident. The most appropriate first step in your treatment of these children should be to

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: In a scenario where 500 children have been exposed to radiation from a nuclear power plant accident, the most appropriate first step in treatment should be to prescribe potassium iodide to protect their thyroids. This is because potassium iodide can saturate the thyroid gland, preventing the absorption of radioactive iodine, which helps reduce the risk of developing thyroid cancer due to radiation exposure. Ordering thyroid function tests (option B) would not be the immediate priority as the focus should be on preventive measures to reduce the absorption of radioactive iodine. Similarly, ordering complete blood counts (option C) may not be as crucial in the acute phase of radiation exposure management. Doing nothing acutely and evaluating in 4-6 weeks (option D) is not advisable as immediate intervention is necessary to minimize the risk of thyroid damage in these children. Time is critical in radiation exposure cases, and delaying appropriate treatment can lead to severe health consequences. From an educational perspective, understanding the rationale behind the use of potassium iodide in radiation exposure incidents is crucial for healthcare professionals working in settings where such emergencies can occur. This knowledge empowers healthcare providers to take prompt and effective actions to protect individuals, especially vulnerable populations like children, from the harmful effects of radiation exposure.

Question 2 of 5

A 16-year-old mother complaining of breast engorgement feels unhappy living with her husband. The MOST appropriate action is

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is option A, which is to refer the 16-year-old mother to an obstetrician. This is the most appropriate action because the situation described in the question involves not just physical symptoms (breast engorgement) but also emotional distress (feeling unhappy living with her husband). As a healthcare provider, it is crucial to address both the physical and emotional well-being of the patient. Referring her to an obstetrician will ensure that she receives appropriate medical evaluation and support for her breast engorgement while also opening the door for further assessment of her emotional health and living situation. Option B, advising her to apply stimulant medications for milk expression, is incorrect because it only addresses the physical symptom of breast engorgement and does not consider the underlying emotional distress that the mother is experiencing. Simply focusing on milk expression without addressing her emotional well-being and living situation is not comprehensive care. Option C, explaining that breast engorgement is a normal phenomenon, is also incorrect in this context. While it is true that breast engorgement can be a common occurrence in postpartum mothers, dismissing the mother's emotional distress and living situation as normal could neglect a potential serious issue that needs intervention. Option D, stopping feeding the baby, is not only incorrect but also harmful advice. Ceasing breastfeeding abruptly can lead to engorgement, mastitis, and other complications for both the mother and the baby. It does not address the mother's emotional well-being or the underlying issues causing her distress. In an educational context, this question highlights the importance of a holistic approach to patient care, especially in pediatrics. It emphasizes the need to consider not just the physical symptoms but also the emotional and social factors that can impact a patient's health and well-being. Understanding the interconnectedness of physical, emotional, and social aspects of health is essential for providing comprehensive and effective care to pediatric patients and their families.

Question 3 of 5

Regarding the physical growth of middle childhood (6-11 yr), all are true EXCEPT

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: In middle childhood (6-11 years), physical growth is a crucial aspect of development. The correct answer, option C, states that brain myelinization stops by 8 years old, which is false. Brain myelinization continues throughout childhood and into adolescence, playing a key role in cognitive development. Option A is true as children in this age range typically gain around 3-3.5 kg of weight per year due to muscle development and increased bone density. Option B is also accurate, with children growing approximately 6-7 cm in height annually during middle childhood as they experience growth spurts. Option D, stating that deciduous teeth fall out by 6 years old, is incorrect. While children may start losing their baby teeth around this age, the process typically continues beyond 6 years old as permanent teeth replace the primary ones. Understanding these physical growth milestones in middle childhood is essential for educators and healthcare providers to monitor children's development and detect any deviations early on. By recognizing these norms, professionals can provide appropriate support and interventions to ensure optimal growth and development in children.

Question 4 of 5

A 5-year old boy presents with afebrile generalized tonic-clonic seizure lasting for 5 minutes. Previously he was healthy and had no such problem. On examination there is no abnormality. Your plan of management should be:

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct plan of management for a 5-year-old boy presenting with an afebrile generalized tonic-clonic seizure lasting for 5 minutes is to request for an EEG and start anticonvulsant therapy immediately (Option C). The rationale behind this choice is based on the following reasons: 1. **Urgency**: Given that the child has experienced a seizure, it is important to initiate treatment promptly to prevent further seizures and potential complications. 2. **Diagnostic Confirmation**: Requesting an EEG will help confirm the presence of abnormal brain activity, which can guide the choice of anticonvulsant therapy. 3. **Early Intervention**: Starting anticonvulsant therapy immediately can help control or prevent future seizures, reducing the risk of recurrence and associated adverse outcomes. Now, let's discuss why the other options are incorrect: - Option A: Starting anticonvulsant therapy without confirming the diagnosis through an EEG may lead to unnecessary medication use and potential side effects. - Option B: Waiting for the EEG report before initiating treatment can delay necessary intervention and put the child at risk of further seizures. - Option D: Requesting both an EEG and MRI may be excessive at this stage when the immediate priority is to address the acute seizure episode and start appropriate therapy. In an educational context, it is crucial for healthcare providers to understand the importance of prompt diagnosis and management of pediatric seizures. This case highlights the significance of a comprehensive approach that combines diagnostic testing with timely therapeutic interventions to ensure the best outcomes for the child's health and well-being.

Question 5 of 5

A 16-year-old discusses his recent diagnosis of lupus with the nurse. Which statement best describes adolescent thinking regarding the future?

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: In this scenario, option B, "Adolescents are beginning to think abstractly and consider future possibilities," is the correct answer. This statement aligns with Piaget's theory of cognitive development, specifically the formal operational stage that typically begins around age 12. During this stage, adolescents develop the ability to think abstractly, reason logically, and consider hypothetical situations, including future possibilities. Option A, "Adolescents are preoccupied with the present," is incorrect because it oversimplifies adolescent thinking. While adolescents may prioritize immediate concerns, they are also capable of contemplating future outcomes and planning ahead. Option C, "Adolescents think only in concrete terms," is incorrect as it contradicts the developmental stage of formal operations during adolescence. This option reflects a characteristic of concrete operational thinking, which is typical of younger children, not adolescents. Option D, "Adolescents are overly concerned with past events," is incorrect as it focuses on past-oriented thinking, which is not the primary cognitive focus of adolescents. While adolescents may reflect on past experiences, their cognitive abilities are more geared towards future-oriented thinking during this stage of development. Educationally, understanding adolescent cognitive development is crucial for healthcare providers working with this age group, as it helps in communication, decision-making, and providing appropriate support. By recognizing that adolescents are beginning to think abstractly and consider future possibilities, healthcare professionals can tailor their interactions and interventions to better meet the needs of adolescent patients.

Access More Questions!

ATI RN Basic


$89/ 30 days

ATI RN Premium


$150/ 90 days

Similar Questions