HESI A2
Reading Comprehension Practice Test HESI A2 Questions
Question 1 of 5
Which of the following is not listed as a detail in the passage about Aromatherapy?
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: In this question, the correct answer is C) Vanilla worked better than lemon for stress. This is not listed as a detail in the passage about Aromatherapy. The other options are mentioned in the passage. A) Subjects were given mild stressors: This detail is mentioned in the passage, indicating that subjects were exposed to mild stressors during the study. B) Lemon and lavender scents were tested: This is also a detail from the passage, specifying the scents that were used in the study. D) The study took place at Ohio State University: This information is included in the passage, providing the location where the study on aromatherapy was conducted. Educationally, understanding how to identify key details in a passage is crucial for reading comprehension, especially in the field of pharmacology where precise information is vital. This question assesses the ability to extract specific details related to aromatherapy research, emphasizing the importance of careful reading and attention to detail in academic and professional settings.
Question 2 of 5
What is the meaning of the word consensus as it is used in the last paragraph about Barefoot Running?
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: In this context, the word "consensus" refers to unanimity, which means an agreement or harmony among a group. The correct answer is D) Unanimity because the paragraph is likely discussing how there is an agreement or shared understanding about barefoot running among experts or practitioners. Option A) Investigation does not fit the context because the paragraph is not about researching or exploring barefoot running but about a shared perspective. Option B) Purpose is also incorrect as the paragraph is not discussing the intention or objective of barefoot running but rather the common agreement on it. Option C) Trepidation, meaning fear or anxiety, is not relevant in this context as there is no mention of fear or apprehension related to barefoot running in the paragraph. Educationally, understanding the meaning of words in context is crucial for effective reading comprehension. It helps students grasp the nuances of language and interpret information accurately. Encouraging students to analyze the context in which a word is used can enhance their comprehension skills and ability to select the correct meaning based on the given text.
Question 3 of 5
Which statement would not be inferred by the reader in the passage about Barefoot Running?
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D - "Before 1950, even Olympic runners ran barefoot." This statement would not be inferred by the reader in the passage about Barefoot Running because the passage does not mention Olympic runners specifically or provide a historical timeline of when runners began wearing shoes. Option A - "Runners who take their shoes off may face some hazards" can be inferred from the potential risks associated with barefoot running mentioned in the passage, such as increased vulnerability to sharp objects or rough surfaces. Option B - "Modern running shoes may increase the odds for injury" is also supported by the passage, which discusses how cushioned running shoes can alter natural running mechanics and contribute to injuries. Option C - "Walking barefoot is good for the muscles and tendons" aligns with the passage's emphasis on the benefits of barefoot activities for foot strength and flexibility. In an educational context, understanding how to infer information from a passage is crucial for reading comprehension in pharmacology and other scientific fields. This skill helps students extract key details, make logical connections, and draw accurate conclusions, which are essential for interpreting drug information, patient cases, and research studies accurately. By practicing with passages like these, students can enhance their critical thinking and analytical skills in pharmacology and beyond.
Question 4 of 5
Which of the following statements is an opinion related to Barefoot Running?
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: In this question, the correct answer is A) Running barefoot is natural and advantageous. This statement is an opinion because it reflects a personal belief about barefoot running. It is not a universally proven fact. Option B) The cost of modern running shoes keeps increasing, is a statement of fact related to economics and does not express an opinion about barefoot running. Option C) Concrete sidewalks are harder than dirt paths, is a factual comparison between different running surfaces and does not express an opinion about barefoot running. Option D) The arch of the foot gives a spring to the step, is a statement of anatomy and biomechanics, rather than an opinion about barefoot running. In an educational context, understanding the difference between facts and opinions is crucial for critical thinking and effective communication. Students need to be able to distinguish between objective information and subjective beliefs to evaluate arguments and make informed decisions. In the field of pharmacology, this skill is essential for interpreting research findings, patient experiences, and professional opinions.
Question 5 of 5
Which might be a good title for this passage?
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer for the title of the passage is "The Debate over Barefoot Running" because the passage discusses the ongoing discussion and differing opinions regarding the practice of barefoot running. This title accurately captures the central theme and focus of the text. Option A, "Everyone Should Run Barefoot," is incorrect because it presents a one-sided, overly generalized view that does not align with the nuanced discussion in the passage. Option B, "How to Prevent Running Injuries," is incorrect as it does not reflect the primary topic of debate over barefoot running. Option C, "Modern Road Surfaces Versus Barefoot Running," is also incorrect as it narrows the focus to a comparison between road surfaces and barefoot running, missing the broader scope of the passage which involves various aspects of the debate. In an educational context, understanding how to appropriately title a passage is crucial for readers to grasp the main idea quickly. This question assesses the reader's ability to identify the central theme and purpose of the text, promoting critical reading skills essential for success in pharmacology and healthcare fields.