What is the author's primary purpose in writing the essay about Sunny-Side Up?

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: In this reading comprehension question related to pharmacology, the author's primary purpose in writing the essay about Sunny-Side Up is to inform the readers. The essay likely aims to provide factual information, details, and insights about Sunny-Side Up, which could be a drug, a treatment method, or a pharmacological concept. Option A, to persuade, is incorrect because the essay is not trying to convince the reader to take a specific action or adopt a particular viewpoint. Option B, to reflect, is incorrect as the essay does not seem to be about the author's personal thoughts or experiences. Option C, to entertain, is also incorrect as the focus of the essay is not on entertaining the readers but on providing information. In educational context, understanding the author's purpose in writing is crucial for students to comprehend the main idea of a text and extract relevant information. It helps students differentiate between different types of texts and develop critical reading skills. Recognizing the author's purpose also aids in extracting key information, summarizing effectively, and making informed decisions based on the content presented.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because it accurately summarizes the passage by highlighting the importance of sunlight despite its known negative effects. The passage emphasizes that while sunlight can have harmful consequences, it is also essential and beneficial for overall health. This option captures the key message of the passage by balancing the acknowledgment of sunlight's downsides with the necessity of some sun exposure. Option A is incorrect because it oversimplifies the sunlight exposure recommendation by focusing solely on a specific time limit for light-skinned individuals, neglecting the broader context provided in the passage. Option B is incorrect as it exaggerates the detrimental effects of indoor living without providing a balanced view of sunlight's benefits. Option D is incorrect because it suggests that avoiding direct sunlight entirely is a viable option, which contradicts the passage's emphasis on the importance of some sunlight exposure. Educationally, this question assesses the reader's ability to comprehend nuanced information about sunlight exposure and its effects on health. It highlights the importance of understanding the complexities of a topic like sun exposure, where there are both positive and negative aspects to consider. Students must learn to discern key messages from a passage to accurately summarize and apply the information provided.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A) Appreciative. The overall tone of the essay about "A Short History of the CDC" is appreciative because it highlights the significant contributions and achievements of the CDC over the years. The essay likely discusses the CDC's role in public health, disease prevention, and global health initiatives, showcasing the organization in a positive light. Option B) Awestruck is incorrect because the essay is more likely to present a factual and informative tone rather than one filled with overwhelming admiration or wonder. Option C) Somber is incorrect as the essay is not likely to evoke feelings of sadness or seriousness but rather focus on the accomplishments and evolution of the CDC. Option D) Disheartened is incorrect as it implies a sense of discouragement or disappointment, which is not in line with the likely tone of an essay celebrating the history of the CDC. In an educational context, understanding the tone of a piece of writing is crucial for interpreting the author's attitude and perspective. Recognizing tone helps readers grasp the main message and intention of the text, which is essential for effective reading comprehension and critical analysis in pharmacology and other academic disciplines.

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: In this reading comprehension question about "A Short History of the CDC," the correct answer is D) What divisions make up the current CDC. This answer is not listed as a detail in the passage because the focus of the passage is on the historical background of the CDC, not its current organizational structure. Option A) Where the organization began is mentioned in the passage, providing important background information. Option B) Who first ran the organization is also discussed in the passage, highlighting key figures in the CDC's history. Option C) When the organization changed its name is another detail included in the passage, showing the evolution of the organization over time. From an educational perspective, understanding how to identify key details in a passage is crucial for improving reading comprehension skills. By analyzing the content closely and differentiating between important historical facts and current organizational details, students can enhance their ability to extract relevant information from text and answer questions accurately.

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: In this question, the correct answer is D) changed its name to match its mission. The passage likely alludes to the organization undergoing a name change to better align with its goals or focus. This inference can be made as the text hints at a transformation within the organization to reflect its purpose. Option A, succeeded in eradicating malaria, is incorrect as there is no direct mention of this achievement in the passage. Option B, has always been led by a medical doctor, is incorrect as the passage does not provide any information regarding the historical leadership of the organization. Option C, no longer studies communicable diseases, is incorrect as there is no indication in the passage that the organization has ceased its study of communicable diseases. Educationally, this question tests the reader's ability to make inferences based on implicit information in a text. It assesses reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, which are essential for interpreting and analyzing information in the field of pharmacology. Understanding implied meanings and drawing logical conclusions are vital skills for healthcare professionals when assessing research findings or patient data.