When defending a scientific argument, which technique is most effective?

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The most effective technique when defending a scientific argument is to show the results of scientific experiments that support your argument. In the realm of science, evidence-based support is crucial. By presenting concrete data and experimental results, you provide a convincing and reliable foundation for your argument. This method allows others to review, replicate, and verify the findings, thus strengthening the credibility of your position. Choices A, C, and D are not as effective as choice B because citing other scientists who agree with your argument (Choice A) may not carry the same weight as empirical evidence, describing your scientific credentials, education, and past accomplishments (Choice C) may not directly address the validity of your argument, and pointing out that no one has come up with a proven alternative explanation (Choice D) does not provide direct evidence supporting your argument.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: Using a computer does not eliminate all subjectivity and potential bias from an experiment. While computers can assist in data collection and analysis, the design and execution of the research study can still be influenced by subjectivity and bias introduced by researchers. Researchers need to recognize their potential biases and take measures to reduce them throughout the research process. Choice A is correct as computers are valuable for managing large datasets. Choice B is correct as computers can efficiently work with instruments and record data. Choice D is correct as computers excel in performing complex calculations faster and more accurately than humans.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The main problem with this experiment is that there are too many variables that are not being controlled for. The investigator is only changing one variable (temperature) while there are other variables at play such as humidity, exposure to light, and potential differences in the material itself. Without controlling or accounting for these additional variables, it would be difficult to determine if any observed differences in durability are solely due to temperature. Choice A is incorrect because the issue is not solely about the number of subjects but about the lack of control over variables. Choice B is not the main problem as the order of placement may not significantly impact the results. Choice D is incorrect as the experiment lacks proper control over variables, which is a crucial aspect of good experimental procedure.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The best course of action is to publish the results anyway, acknowledging that her hypothesis seems to have been incorrect. Science relies on accurate reporting and transparency, even if the results do not align with the original hypothesis. This allows for further discussion, analysis, and potentially new hypotheses to be developed based on the findings. It is essential in scientific research to report both positive and negative results to contribute to the body of knowledge and advance understanding in the field. Choice B is incorrect because persisting with the same experiment to force results to align with the hypothesis goes against scientific integrity and may lead to biased conclusions. Choice C is incorrect as changing the hypothesis after obtaining results is not scientifically sound and undermines the credibility of the research. Choice D is incorrect because science embraces the possibility of experimental results contradicting hypotheses, as this provides valuable insights for refining theories and expanding scientific knowledge.