What is the difference between a pure substance and a mixture?

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: Pure substances have a definite and constant composition, meaning they are made up of only one type of atom or molecule with fixed proportions. This composition does not vary. On the other hand, mixtures are composed of two or more substances physically combined. The components of a mixture can be present in varying proportions, leading to a variable composition. Choice A is correct as it accurately distinguishes between pure substances and mixtures based on the fixed composition of pure substances and the variable composition of mixtures. Choice B is incorrect because mixtures, not pure substances, have variable compositions. Choice C is incorrect as both pure substances and mixtures can exist in different states. Choice D is incorrect because pure substances can be compounds as well, not exclusively elements, and mixtures can contain elements and compounds.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because if an object is initially at rest and no force is acting on it, it will remain at rest due to Newton's First Law of Motion. This law states that an object at rest will stay at rest unless acted upon by an external force. Choices A, C, and D all involve forces acting on the object, which would cause it to move according to Newton's laws of motion. Choice A, a constant force acting on the object, would cause it to move at a constant velocity. Choice C, a force that increases in magnitude over time, would accelerate the object. Choice D, a force that decreases in magnitude over time, would decelerate the object.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: At the peak of its trajectory, the ball momentarily stops moving before falling back down. This means its kinetic energy is at a minimum because it has come to a stop. At the same time, its potential energy is at a maximum because it is at the highest point in its trajectory, where it has the most potential to fall and convert that potential energy into kinetic energy as it descends. Choice A is incorrect because at the peak, the ball still has potential energy due to its height. Choice C is incorrect because kinetic energy is at a minimum when the ball is momentarily at rest. Choice D is incorrect because the energy conversion between potential and kinetic energy occurs at different points in the trajectory.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: In circular motion at a constant speed, the car has a constant centripetal acceleration (choice A), experiences a force directed towards the center of the circle (choice C), and covers the same distance in equal time intervals along its circular path (choice D). However, the tangential velocity of an object in circular motion at a constant speed changes continuously as it moves around the circle, so it is not constant (choice B). The change in tangential velocity allows the car to maintain its motion in a circular path despite moving at a constant speed. Choice A is incorrect because centripetal acceleration is indeed present to keep the car moving in a circular path. Choice C is incorrect as a force towards the center is required to keep the car in circular motion. Choice D is incorrect because the car covers equal distances in equal time intervals to maintain its circular trajectory.

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: Rationale: A) Mutations in genes: Mutations are changes in the DNA sequence that can introduce new alleles into a population, leading to genetic variation. B) Genetic drift (random fluctuations in allele frequencies): Genetic drift refers to random changes in allele frequencies in a population, which can lead to genetic variation through chance events. C) Gene flow (movement of genes between populations): Gene flow occurs when individuals move between populations, bringing new alleles with them and increasing genetic variation within populations. D) Blending inheritance (traits of parents are averaged in offspring): Blending inheritance was a historical theory that suggested offspring inherit a blend of traits from their parents, leading to a reduction in genetic variation over time. However, this concept has been disproven by the understanding of Mendelian genetics, where traits are inherited independently and do not blend together. Therefore, blending inheritance does not contribute