ATI TEAS 7
Reading TEAS Practice Test Questions
Question 1 of 5
What is the best summary of the instructor's motive in sending the email to the students?
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Answer choice B is the correct summary of the instructor's motive in sending the email to the students. The passage mentions that the instructor acknowledged the low exam scores, including a high failure rate and the need to reconsider the grading plan for the semester. This indicates that the instructor wants to adjust the grading plan to provide students with an opportunity to improve their scores. Choice A is incorrect as it focuses on expressing concern rather than on adjusting the grading plan. Choice C is unrelated as it discusses the purpose of a group project. Choice D is also incorrect as it mentions the strict grading policy set at the beginning of the semester, which is not the main focus of the email sent by the instructor.
Question 2 of 5
To which section of the library should Jorgen go to locate these works?
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: Jorgen should go to Section 800 to locate The Iliad and The Odyssey by Homer. These works are literary masterpieces and would be categorized under literature in the library. While sections 100, 200, and 700 cover Philosophy and psychology, Religion, and Arts and recreation respectively, they are not the most suitable sections for finding works of literature like The Iliad and The Odyssey.
Question 3 of 5
To which chapter should Regina turn if she needs to find out what to do if the car begins overheating?
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: An overheating vehicle is considered an emergency situation, so Regina should refer to Chapter VI, which covers emergencies in the car owner's manual. Chapter III focuses on Audio, Climate, and Voice Controls, which is not relevant to an overheating car. Chapter IV discusses Pre-Driving and Driving, which does not address overheating. Chapter I pertains to Vehicle Instruments and is not the appropriate chapter for handling an overheating car.
Question 4 of 5
Which of the following statements represents the best summary of the claims made in this passage?
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: Option C best summarizes the claims made in the passage. Studying a foreign language is highlighted as important for the global economy, college acceptance rates, and becoming a sought-after candidate in the job market. The passage emphasizes that as technology advances, communication across borders becomes crucial, making foreign language skills valuable. High school graduates with foreign language credits tend to have higher college acceptance rates. Additionally, mastering more than one language increases desirability in the job market. Option A is too narrow, focusing only on high school graduation and job prospects. Option B, while mentioning the global economy, misses the emphasis on college acceptance rates and job market desirability. Option D is also limited, as it only considers college acceptance rates and job prospects but does not cover the importance of foreign languages for the global economy.
Question 5 of 5
Which of the following would be a useful source of information to determine the validity of the argument presented in the passage?
Correct Answer: D
Rationale: The passage emphasizes the importance of studying a foreign language in high school for future success, including college acceptance rates and job market demand. To evaluate the argument's validity, it is crucial to examine the direct impact of studying a foreign language on college acceptance rates. Choice D is the correct answer because it directly addresses this aspect by comparing the correlation between high school students' study of a foreign language and subsequent college acceptance rates. This comparison would provide concrete evidence supporting or refuting the argument presented in the passage. Choices A, B, and C, though related to language education, do not directly assess the specific relationship between studying a foreign language in high school and college acceptance rates, making them less relevant for evaluating the argument's validity.