What can one infer about the meaning of the word 'Juggernaut' from the author's use of it in the passage?

Questions 82

ATI TEAS 7

ATI TEAS 7 Test Bank

Reading TEAS Practice Test Questions

Question 1 of 5

What can one infer about the meaning of the word 'Juggernaut' from the author's use of it in the passage?

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The use of the word 'Juggernaut' in the passage describes a disturbing and terrifying figure that tramples a child in the narrator's dream, evoking fear and horror. The description of the 'human Juggernaut' treading the child down and passing on regardless of her screams conveys a sense of menace and cruelty associated with the term. This portrayal does not align with choices A, C, or D. Choice A about an apparition appearing at daybreak is not supported by the text; choice C regarding space travel is completely unrelated to the context; and choice D suggesting Mr. Utterson finds it soothing contradicts the fearful and unsettling depiction of the 'Juggernaut' in the passage. Therefore, option B, 'It scares children,' is the most accurate inference based on the author's use of the word in the text.

Question 2 of 5

Given the information in the passages, which of the following must be true about assault?

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The passages clearly outline that assault can manifest in different forms, including physical strikes, threatening body language, and provocative language. This variety of actions demonstrates that there are indeed various forms of assault. This choice is correct because it aligns with the information provided in the passages. Choice A is incorrect as the passages differentiate between lethal force and assault, indicating that not all assault involves lethal force. Choice C is incorrect since there are no restrictions mentioned regarding who can commit assault. Choice D is incorrect because the passages do not provide a blanket justification for assault but rather emphasize the unlawful and threatening nature of such actions.

Question 3 of 5

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in Passage I, third paragraph?

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author in Passage I discusses the concept of lethal force in self-defense being justified and absolved from blame when used as a last resort to prevent severe harm or death. Choice A undermines this by stating that an instance of lethal force in self-defense is not absolutely absolved from blame and highlights that the law considers the necessary use of force at the time it is committed. This challenges the absolute justification of such actions and would seriously undermine the author's argument. Choice B is incorrect because compliance with the law does not necessarily address the justification and absolution of lethal force. Choice C is incorrect as forgiving lethal force in all cases is not the focus of the author's argument. Choice D is incorrect because the intent of the user is a crucial factor in evaluating the use of lethal force, contrary to what is stated.

Question 4 of 5

Based on the passages, what can we infer about the relationship between assault and lethal force?

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: From the passages provided, it can be inferred that an assault with deadly intent can lead to an individual using lethal force to defend themselves and preserve their well-being. This suggests a relationship between assault with deadly intent and the potential use of lethal force in self-defense situations. Choice A is incorrect because lethal force is not always a direct result of assault, as it depends on the circumstances. Choice B is incorrect as not all assaults lead to the use of lethal force by someone. Choice D is incorrect as the definition of deadly force and assault are distinct, with deadly force typically being used in self-defense situations where there is an immediate threat of severe harm or death.

Question 5 of 5

Which of the following best describes the way the passages are structured?

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The passages are structured in a way where both begin by defining a legal concept (assault and battery) and then provide further explanations and examples to help clarify and elaborate on the concepts. Both passages open with a clear definition and then proceed to discuss the concept in various situations. Choice A is correct because it accurately captures the structure of the passages. Choice B is incorrect because the passages do not introduce accepted definitions after presenting situations; they define the legal concepts first. Choice C is incorrect because the first passage does not present a long definition, it begins by defining lethal force and then provides examples. Choice D is incorrect because while the passages explain legal concepts, they do not specifically cite legal doctrines or explain rulings.

Access More Questions!

ATI TEAS Basic


$99/ 30 days

ATI TEAS Premium Plus


$150/ 90 days

Similar Questions